On Tue, 2002-12-03 at 09:06, Jeff Heflin wrote: [...] > Massimo, this is a really good point that I hadn't considered. If > Automobile is the sameClassAs Car, and Car is a subClassOf > DeprecatedClass does that make Automobile a DeprecatedClass? no. > If so, then > my example is broken. However, I don't think the semantics work that > way. I've looked at our semantic documents and it seems that > owl:sameClassAs only means that two classes have the same extension > (i.e., they have the same members). As far as I can tell, it says > nothing about whether properties of the classes are the same. Exactly right. > Pat or > Peter, can you correct me if I'm wrong on this? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Tuesday, 3 December 2002 10:17:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:55 GMT