Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval

From: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Subject: Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:49:27 +0200

> > One reason that I oppose the tests that Jeremy has produced, is, as I 
> had
> > previously mentioned but forgot to bring up on the teleconference, is 
> they
> > do not do what they purport to do.
> >
> > In particular, the first and third tests do not match their description.
> 
> that may very well be my fault as I touched some of Jeremy's descriptions
> to document that the 3rd test was not holding (Jeremy please check)
> anyway, I can't follow your opposition as we can always reiterate
> 
> -- ,
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Yeah sure, we can always approve something broken and fix it later.
However, why not fix it first?  That seems to be a better approach to me.


peter