W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:04:02 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20020829.220402.68532184.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
To: jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com
Cc: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org

From: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Subject: Re: TEST: Functional and InverseFunctional tests for approval
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 01:49:27 +0200

> > One reason that I oppose the tests that Jeremy has produced, is, as I 
> had
> > previously mentioned but forgot to bring up on the teleconference, is 
> they
> > do not do what they purport to do.
> >
> > In particular, the first and third tests do not match their description.
> 
> that may very well be my fault as I touched some of Jeremy's descriptions
> to document that the 3rd test was not holding (Jeremy please check)
> anyway, I can't follow your opposition as we can always reiterate
> 
> -- ,
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/

Yeah sure, we can always approve something broken and fix it later.
However, why not fix it first?  That seems to be a better approach to me.


peter
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 22:04:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT