W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Re: SEM: No dark triples

From: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:00:38 -0400
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org, www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF92199698.C9E58BB2-ON85256C24.0067AF9B@pok.ibm.com>

Jeremey, et al,

This may happen, but let's hold off on canceling the request until more of 
us have had a chance to think about this and check Pat's document. 
Personally, I'm not completely convinced that we can completely avoid dark 
triples, though my current understanding of Pat's document certainly 
drastically reduces the places they might be needed.  I don't know about 
the others in the apparently quite small group of people who've actually 
read it, but I haven't gone through Pat's update carefully enough yet to 
be convinced it is the case.  I'll need about a week, again I don't know 
about others.

-Chris

Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group
IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr.
Hawthorne, NY  10532     USA 
Voice: +1 914.784.7055,  IBM T/L: 863.7055
Fax: +1 914.784.6078, Email: welty@us.ibm.com





"Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Sent by: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
08/29/2002 01:56 PM

 
        To:     <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        SEM: No dark triples

 



At the telecon I heard Pat say that we don't need dark triples.
Since RDF Core currently has a request from WebOnt to provide dark 
triples,
and that this will delay their work, I propose that we action the chair to
cancel the request.

Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 29 August 2002 15:01:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT