- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 17:38:05 -0400
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, phayes@ai.uwf.edu
- Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
At 10:48 AM -0400 8/28/02, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >As an indication of how things can go wrong in a complicated specification, >Pat's document is very close to implying that all RDFS classes and >properties are OWL objects. [snip] > >peter Peter, for those of us who are not as logically inclined as you, could you make it clear why the above would be a problem and what the consequences would be? If someone asked me "Should RDFS classes and properties be OWL objects" I would have assumed the answer should be yes thanks JH -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 240-731-3822 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 21:54:18 UTC