Mike Dean wrote: > > ACTION: Chairs to find an editor or process to produce the RDF/RDFS/OWL > > Lite/OWL comparison/discussion document. JimH to inform SW-CG this is > > being considered. > > CONTINUED > > I recently added RDF(S) 2002 and OWL to the language > comparison matrix [1] I initially developed for my DAML talk > at the 2001 RDF IG F2F [2]. OWL Lite could easily be added. > Some of the discussion points should be revisited. > > [1] http://www.daml.org/language/features > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/02/rdfig-f2f/ Very good initiative. This is the kind of thing that the feedback on the public list was asking for, and we should link to/include such tables. Extension to OWL Lite would therefore be also very good. Frank. ----Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 06:48:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:51 GMT