Re: language comparison/discussion (was Re: Minutes of WebOnt Meeting August 22, 2002 9:00-10:30 am pacific time) from Frank van Harmelen on 2002-08-27 (www-webont-wg@w3.org from August 2002)

From: Frank van Harmelen <Frank.van.Harmelen@cs.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:46:43 +0200
To: webont <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <134912502.1030452401@[10.10.64.90]>

Mike Dean wrote:

> > ACTION: Chairs to find an editor or process to produce the RDF/RDFS/OWL
> > Lite/OWL comparison/discussion document. JimH to inform SW-CG this is
> > being considered.
> > CONTINUED
>
> I recently added RDF(S) 2002 and OWL to the language
> comparison matrix [1] I initially developed for my DAML talk
> at the 2001 RDF IG F2F [2].  OWL Lite could easily be added.
> Some of the discussion points should be revisited.
>
> [1] http://www.daml.org/language/features
>
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/02/rdfig-f2f/

Very good initiative. This is the kind of thing that the feedback on the 
public list was asking for, and we should link to/include such tables.
Extension to OWL Lite would therefore be also very good.

Frank.
   ----

Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 06:48:44 UTC