W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: SEM: Layering

From: <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 15:54:20 +0200
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <OF2A73C834.9C996025-ONC1256BA7.004B1BAA@bayer-ag.com>

> I should add my apologies to Pat's for having missed your message
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0200.html
> I, too, like it.

me too

> I comment on whether <false> is a useful RDF graph, extending the analysis.
> I think this message ends up very much in agreement ... (see end of
> message).

I agree with your <false> analysis Jeremy

As an aside...
I'm still wondering about what is giving us a license
to *get* a list (term) from it's description
(a thing is not the same as a description of the thing)
I have thought that is was dereferencing, but that
is wrong I think now (so no use/mention bug)
It's also not the fact that first/rest are unique
properties, at least I don't see that.
The best I can think of is that it is Mike's TINV mapping
of first/rest triples into a functional term cons(f,r)
For the moment we (still) keep the first/rest triples
asserted in our engine (as a matter of testing stuff)
but I'm feeling myself in a darkness

Received on Friday, 26 April 2002 09:56:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:43 UTC