W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: DTTF: List Ontology test case

From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:36:57 -0400
Message-ID: <038701c1ec5e$45f6aec0$0a2e249b@nemc.org>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>
> I certainly don't dispute that saying the daml:Lists constraints
> normatively in English would be a good thing.

I was thinking that the OWL MT would have the normative definition of an
owl:List.

>
> It's just I find it an odd exception if we cannot use OWL to say things
> that it is clearly capable of saying about other things, when we are
trying
> to build a description of itself, such as daml:first being a
> UniqueProperty. i.e. my position is having normatively bootstrapped in
> English, that OWL is then capable of describing some aspects of itself.
>

I agree, but that is an entirely different issue (one that I think was
prematurely closed - btw)

Jonathan
Received on Thursday, 25 April 2002 10:10:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:49 GMT