- From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:28:49 -0400
- To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: <mike.dean@bbn.com>
Jeremy, > I heard that the set of people who understood what the Q things were was small, > and that no-one in that set could think of a good reason for having them. ... > > (I believe that the unqualified restrictions are commonly implemented as qualified > restrictions). Can this be confirmed i.e. does this mean that there is _effectively_ no difference between the qualified and unqualified restrictions? If this is the case, then I have no objection to removing them. I just want to be sure what is what before we decide. > > > > > 2) Mike Dean had already raised another issue [3.2 Qualified Restrictions]. > > How is this issue different from the issue at hand? I presume Mike has a > > desire for qualified restrictions, otherwise why was that issue raised. At > > the very least we should hear what Mike et al. have to say before closing > > the issue. > > I used the URLref of Mike's issue. > Unfortunately someone changed the fragment ID under my feet! :) > > This is the same as that issue. Ok, then can Mike better explain why the issue was raised in the first place (the archives are equally scantly on this)? I don't mean to hold up progress, I just want to be systematic. Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 14:34:06 UTC