W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2002

RE: proposed resolution of Qualified Restrictions

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 09:53:46 +0100
To: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@openhealth.org>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDAENBCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

Jonathan:
> I think this issue deserves at the very least a written explanation for the
> archives. The minutes of the F2F do not have such an explanation.

The qualified restrictions of DAML+OIL:
- have added to the difficulty of learning the language
- have not been used in practice
- are barely understood by the community
- potentially add to the difficulty of implementing the language
- have no compelling use cases


therefore:

> >
> > Proposed Resolution
> > ===================
> >
> > I propose that the WG
> > - decides that the qualified restrictions of DAML+OIL are not part of OWL.
> > - approves the test cases of
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Apr/0126.html
> >   as reflecting this decision.
> > - closes the unmentioned-qualified-restrictions issue.
> >
> >
Received on Wednesday, 24 April 2002 05:10:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:57:49 GMT