> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf2.html I found: "finding agreement on the proposed paragraphs...@@" the proposed para that was read out was: > >If the WebOnt language is to > 1/ use RDF syntax, and > 2/ be an extension of RDF, and > 3/ to be able to entail appropriate class memberships, >then the WebOnt language needs to have a facility for having RDF triples >that do not denote in the RDF model theory (a.k.a. dark triples) and URI >references that do not denote in the RDF model theory (e.g., URI references >that only exist in dark triples). JeremyReceived on Thursday, 18 April 2002 08:45:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:43 UTC