RE: ftf2 record: roll call?

>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf2.html
I found:

"finding agreement on the proposed paragraphs...@@"

the proposed para that was read out was:


>
>If the WebOnt language is to
>   1/ use RDF syntax, and
>   2/ be an extension of RDF, and
>   3/ to be able to entail appropriate class memberships,
>then the WebOnt language needs to have a facility for having RDF triples
>that do not denote in the RDF model theory (a.k.a. dark triples) and URI
>references that do not denote in the RDF model theory (e.g., URI references
>that only exist in dark triples).


Jeremy