W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2002

RE: ftf2 record: roll call?

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:45:17 +0100
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDEELHCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
>  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/ftf2.html
I found:

"finding agreement on the proposed paragraphs...@@"

the proposed para that was read out was:

>If the WebOnt language is to
>   1/ use RDF syntax, and
>   2/ be an extension of RDF, and
>   3/ to be able to entail appropriate class memberships,
>then the WebOnt language needs to have a facility for having RDF triples
>that do not denote in the RDF model theory (a.k.a. dark triples) and URI
>references that do not denote in the RDF model theory (e.g., URI references
>that only exist in dark triples).

Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 08:45:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:43 UTC