W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: GUIDE: UML notations for OWL

From: Leo Obrst <lobrst@mitre.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 09:01:54 -0500
Message-ID: <3CAC5CD2.88B0E9A9@mitre.org>
To: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl>
CC: WebOnt WG <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

I think this is a very useful beginning for the GUIDE group. UML is
probably known by many more people who are prospective developers and
users of OWL* (or whatever the language will be called) and showing a
rough translation between OWL* and UML is important. In your document, I
also see placeholders for limitations, etc., and I consider these
important too: the lack of a formalized semantics for UML, for example,
though that may be changing. What will OWL* give you that UML (or any
other language) cannot?


Guus Schreiber wrote:
> As input for the GUIDE focus area I've written a short note on how to
> represent the
> frame part of OWL in UML. See:
>   http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/docs/owl-uml/owl-uml.html
> Feedback is very welcome, both on the content and on whether this type
> of exercise is of use for the WG.
> Guus
> --
> A. Th. Schreiber, SWI, University of Amsterdam, Roetersstraat 15
> NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Tel: +31 20 525 6793
> Fax: +31 20 525 6896; E-mail: schreiber@swi.psy.uva.nl
> WWW: http://www.swi.psy.uva.nl/usr/Schreiber/home.html

Dr. Leo Obrst		The MITRE Corporation
mailto:lobrst@mitre.org Intelligent Information Management/Exploitation
Voice: 703-883-6770	7515 Colshire Drive, M/S W640
Fax: 703-883-1379       McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA
Received on Thursday, 4 April 2002 09:01:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:42 UTC