- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 11:48:27 -0600
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com, www-webont-wg@w3.org, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
"Peter F. Patel-Schneider" wrote:
[...]
> My opinion as a WOW-G member, for what it is worth, is that S is
> fatally flawed because it is not compatible with exising XML usage.
Would you please elaborate? He gave an example in RDF/XML:
<rdf:Description rdf:about="aaa">
<eg:prop xsd:integer="10" />
</rdf:Description>
How is that not compatible with existing XML usage?
Just to fill out the details, here's the
complete RDF/xml document implicit around
the example Jeremy gave, including namespace
declarations etc.:
<rdf:RDF
xmlns:eg="http://example/vocab#"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="aaa">
<eg:prop xsd:integer="10"/>
</rdf:Description>
</rdf:RDF>
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 19 November 2001 12:49:39 UTC