Re: proposal for working on the ontology language

From: Leo Obrst <lobrst@mitre.org>
Subject: Re: proposal for working on the ontology language
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 18:14:42 -0500

[...]

> I also note that there is no meta level to DAML+OIL and I think that was
> a conscious choice, no?, though I don't know the history of that
> decision. Sometimes having a modifiable meta level is a very good thing
> (future language extensions, e.g.)
> 
> Leo

I would be very interested in hearing of cases where a modifiable meta
level was actually used.  I wouild be even more interested in hearing of
such cases that also involved a logical formalism.

peter

Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2001 18:23:07 UTC