- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:49:38 +0200
- To: John Barone <jbarone@xythos.com>
- CC: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
John Barone wrote: > Yes, that would be fine. > > I wasn't privy to the original discussion that resulted in the MUST. > So, I don't know if there are some client requirements/concerns that > would be stepped on by changing it to a SHOULD. > ... I would assume that any query that DAV:limits itself, or results in server-enforced truncation, is unlikely to be useful in a programmatic client. So I wouldn't expect this to be a problem. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 18:50:27 UTC