One of the original goals of DASL is to be able to create queries that easily translate to SQL. If you have a DASL interpreter of this type (as is the case with Catacomb), then the collation order is, to a large extent, outside the control of the DASL implementation. The collation order is controlled by the underlying SQL engine. I imagine that if the DASL specification indicated a collation order that was inconsistent with the underlying query engine use by an implementation, the implementation would just ignore the specification. - JimReceived on Monday, 18 December 2006 19:08:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 October 2007 06:12:35 GMT