Julian, you keep saying there are no URL properties. Where do you get this dogma from? URL properties could be useful, are implemented, and are not forbidden as far as I know. You may feel there *should* be no URL properties but it's misleading to state that as fact. Lisa Dusseault > -----Original Message----- > From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke > Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 8:13 AM > To: Wallmer, Martin > Cc: 'www-webdav-dasl@w3.org' > Subject: Re: SEARCH for displayname > > > > Wallmer, Martin wrote: > > Martin, I'll add this to the open issues. One comment inline. > > > > The former discussion showed, that it is a common task to somehow > > filter resources according to the "displayname". With BIND, several > > URI's may point to the same resource. So a kind of "displayname" is > > not a property of the resource, but of the URI. > > No, that's incorrect. There are no "URI properties". The > DAV:displayname > of a resource should be the same, no matter which URI you use > to access it. > > Therefore, this whole thing is about filtering by "last path > segment", > not by displayname. > > > ... > > Regards, Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 > >Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2003 14:43:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:09 GMT