W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > October to December 2003

RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on the draft

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 09:19:43 +0200
To: "yamuna prakash" <yamunap@hotmail.com>, <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCAEEOIMAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

OK,

so do we have agreement for

- allowing multiple scopes in DAV:basicsearch and
- requiring servers that do not support multiple scopes to detect this and
reject the request?

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

> -----Original Message-----
> From: yamuna prakash [mailto:yamunap@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 11:02 PM
> To: julian.reschke@gmx.de; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on the
> draft
>
>
> Agreed. I think it would be beneficial to make it optional rather than
> preculde it totally.
>
> The other maybe goes into the nice to have list :)
>
> prakash
>
> >From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> >To: "yamuna prakash" <yamunap@hotmail.com>,
> ><julian.reschke@gmx.de>,<www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
> >Subject: RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on
> the draft
> >Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:24:45 +0200
> >
> >
> > > From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> > > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of yamuna prakash
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:02 PM
> > > To: julian.reschke@gmx.de; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> > > Subject: RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on the
> > > draft
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From my perspective the behavior should be identical as to what
> > > is defined
> > > for single scope i.e. I believe all the other aspects of a search
> >request
> > > (select, where, orderby, etc) should behave the way they have
> > > been defined
> > > for single scope.
> > >
> > > However I can see scenarios wherein it would definitely be
> useful if the
> > > user can specify the ability to group results by scope.
> > > ..
> >
> >See,
> >
> >this is exactly why we are so reluctant to add new things.
> Frequently, they
> >turn out to be not as simple as suggested.
> >
> >So I'd propose either to make the minimal change I suggested (allowing
> >multiple scopes (optional), and defining a condition code for
> servers that
> >don't support that), or not to put it into DAV:basicsearch.
> >
> >Julian
> >
> >--
> ><green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
> >
> >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Three simple steps. They guarantee your safety.
> http://server1.msn.co.in/features/general/SMBvirus/index.asp Protect
> yourself against the SMB.EXE virus.
>
Received on Friday, 10 October 2003 03:24:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:09 GMT