W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > October to December 2003

RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on the draft

From: yamuna prakash <yamunap@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 21:02:18 +0000
To: julian.reschke@gmx.de, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Message-ID: <BAY2-F165ecd92bXCH5000001f8@hotmail.com>

Agreed. I think it would be beneficial to make it optional rather than 
preculde it totally.

The other maybe goes into the nice to have list :)

prakash

>From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
>To: "yamuna prakash" <yamunap@hotmail.com>, 
><julian.reschke@gmx.de>,<www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
>Subject: RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on the draft
>Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 13:24:45 +0200
>
>
> > From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of yamuna prakash
> > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:02 PM
> > To: julian.reschke@gmx.de; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: draft-reschke-webdav-search-05 - a few questions on the
> > draft
> >
> >
> >
> > From my perspective the behavior should be identical as to what
> > is defined
> > for single scope i.e. I believe all the other aspects of a search 
>request
> > (select, where, orderby, etc) should behave the way they have
> > been defined
> > for single scope.
> >
> > However I can see scenarios wherein it would definitely be useful if the
> > user can specify the ability to group results by scope.
> > ..
>
>See,
>
>this is exactly why we are so reluctant to add new things. Frequently, they
>turn out to be not as simple as suggested.
>
>So I'd propose either to make the minimal change I suggested (allowing
>multiple scopes (optional), and defining a condition code for servers that
>don't support that), or not to put it into DAV:basicsearch.
>
>Julian
>
>--
><green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Three simple steps. They guarantee your safety. 
http://server1.msn.co.in/features/general/SMBvirus/index.asp Protect 
yourself against the SMB.EXE virus.
Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 17:08:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:09 GMT