W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: Proposed resolution for issue "score-pseudo-property"

From: Elias <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 11:44:16 -0800
To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Message-id: <3DE91510.4050108@cse.ucsc.edu>

Agreed. Whereas I can contrive a use case for ordering by lowest score 
first, it doesn't strike me as a particularly 'must have' feature. The 
most common case will be people looking for specific content.

Elias


Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> That sounds like the right thing to do.  Ordering by lowest score first
> seems such a low-priority feature that if somebody turns out to need it
> someday they can add an extension for that.
> 
> lisa
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
>>Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 12:41 AM
>>To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
>>Subject: RE: Proposed resolution for issue "score-pseudo-property"

<Prior comment removed>

>>
>>Thinking about it, the relationship *really* is between DAV:nresults
> and  the
>>presence of DAV:score -- not the fact that the client requests
> ordering by
>>DAV:score. Is there a use case for combining DAV:nresults with
> ordering by
>>DAV:score in *ascending* order (lowest scores first)?
>>If not, we can just point out that combining any operator that
> produces
>>scores (right now thats DAV:contains) with DAV:results should cause
>>the server to return the "n" top scoring results.
>>
>>--
>><green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Saturday, 30 November 2002 14:50:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:09 GMT