W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: gte vs. numerical property values

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 12:49:29 +0200
To: "Wallmer, Martin" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKECNFKAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Wallmer, Martin
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:35 PM
> To: 'Julian Reschke'; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: gte vs. numerical property values
> Hi,
> good idea to deal with datatypes :-)
> some questions
> a:)
> how the server may happen to have information about the type of a dead
> property?

For instance, using:


Similar type systems exist in MS Exchange and MS Sharepoint.

> b:)
> what if the server knows about the datatype, and the type in the
> query does
> not match?

Then it should fall back to a string comparison.

> Extended proposal:
> b) A client can enforce comparison using a specific data type by
> specifying
> the type in the query, for instance using:
> <gte xmlns="DAV:">
>   <prop><foo xmlns=""/></prop>
>   <literal xsi:type="xs:long">3</literal>
> </gte>

Another proposal that may be easier to grok for people that don't want to
use XSD data types:

<gte xmlns="DAV:">
  <prop><foo xmlns=""/></prop>

This has the advantage of simplicity (do we more than
boolean/string/number/date in basicsearch?), but wouldn't be
backward-compatible with older drafts.


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 06:50:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:09 GMT