W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: discovery of search arbiters, was: Comments on search-00 draft

From: Lisa Dusseault <ldusseault@xythos.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:33:28 -0800
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00f501c1d747$d7e0ac40$7801a8c0@moose>
> However, AFAIK in *current* implementations *each* WebDAV
> research can act
> as a SEARCH arbiter. In which case the discovery is trivial
> (just look at
> DAV:supported-search-grammar or DAV:supported-method-set).

This is part of my point.  If in all current implementations, every WebDAV
collection (resource?) can act as an arbiter, why not require that for
basicsearch support?  Is there some prospective SEARCH implementation that
couldn't handle that?

Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 12:32:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:42 UTC