W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > January to March 2002

extending multistatus, was: Comments on search-00 draft

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:39:59 +0100
To: "Lisa Dusseault" <ldusseault@xythos.com>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEPAEEAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:42 PM
> To: julian.reschke@greenbytes.de; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> Subject: Comments on search-00 draft
>
>
> Here are my comments on the Internet-Draft
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-reschke-webdav-search-00.txt
>
> ..
>
> c) Section 2.4.1 - vagueness
>
> "  Query grammars SHOULD define how the response matches the PROPFIND
>    response."
>
> This is pretty vague.  Can you explain more?

Again, this section was inherited from the original drafts.

IMHO what it says is that servers MAY extend the multistatus response body
in any RFC2518-compliant way, but in case they do, they should document it.
I don't think this needs to be stated. How about removing the paragraph?

> ...
Received on Friday, 29 March 2002 08:40:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:08 GMT