W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: is-collection - isdefined

From: Wallmer, Martin <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 09:28:45 +0100
Message-ID: <DFF2AC9E3583D511A21F0008C7E6210602D90058@daemsg02.software-ag.de>
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "Wallmer, Martin" <Martin.Wallmer@softwareag.com>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
From my point of view no objections against hyphen based syntax.

Martin

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
Sent: Freitag, 22. März 2002 09:25
To: Wallmer, Martin; www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Subject: RE: is-collection - isdefined


Yes.

"iscollection" existed before and had different semantics. Actually, I'd
prefer to move everything to hypen-based syntax, but that would break
"compatibility" to older versions of the draft (does it really matter? just
asking.).

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Wallmer, Martin
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:13 AM
> To: 'www-webdav-dasl@w3.org'
> Subject: is-collection - isdefined
>
>
> Hi,
>
> just a very minor detail. Is there a reason why is-collection is written
> with a hyphen and isdefined not? If there is no reason I would suggest to
> write both without hyphen.
>
> Regards,
> Martin Wallmer
> Research & Development
> Software AG 			++49 6151 92 1831
> Uhlandstr. 12
> D 64297 Darmstadt
>
>
Received on Friday, 22 March 2002 03:28:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:08 GMT