W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: next steps / open issues in DASL framework

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 23:59:45 +0100
To: "Jim Davis" <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>, <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCOEPJECAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> From: www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webdav-dasl-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Davis
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 6:45 PM
> To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> Subject: Re: next steps / open issues in DASL framework
> ...
> >The last one:
> >
> >JW5:
> >ejw@ics.uci.edu 1999-04-26 On the topic of partial search results, DASL
> >currently has no way for a client to request the next chunk of a set of
> >search results. ...
> >
> >--> My position is "out-of-scope", because nobody seems to have asked for
> >this feature since it was raised. But I'm also willing to propose an
> >extension to DAV:basicsearch that would allow it. Feedback?
> It is not easy to define, so we left it out.
> you can not make it mandatory, since some servers are not willing
> to store
> results  even for a few minutes.

Even in this case it may make sense to query for results 100 to 199, right?
So adding an extension to DAV:limit seems to be reasonable (if a server can
reject it):

<limit xmlns="DAV:">

*If* a server *does* store query results, it may make sense to

a) add an option to return an identifier for the stored query (a URI I
b) add an option to refer to this stored query result.

However, this certainly sounds like out-of-scope, unless the members of this
mailing list feel differently (and are prepared to implement it...).
Received on Friday, 8 March 2002 17:59:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:42 UTC