W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > January to March 2002

RE: DASL Where statement.

From: Sung Kim <hunkim@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 19:19:50 -0800 (PST)
To: "Babich, Alan" <ABabich@filenet.com>
cc: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0201301914300.10484-100000@sundance.cse.ucsc.edu>
Although it is a characteristic of XML, the specified style looks
prefix and postfix. :-)

<d:and>          // prefix
   <d:A/>
   <d:B/>
</d:and>         // postfix

--
Sung Kim <hunkim@cse.ucsc.edu>
http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/~hunkim

 "Dreams become reality!"

On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Babich, Alan wrote:

> Yes, you are correct in your e-mail below about prefix, postfix, and infix.
> As currently specified, all the DASL operators are prefix. None are postfix
> or infix.
>
> Alan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sung Kim [mailto:hunkim@cse.ucsc.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 6:53 PM
> To: Jim Davis
> Cc: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> Subject: RE: DASL Where statement.
>
>
> I thought
>
> prefix : [+ a b]
> infix  : [a + b]
> postfix: [a b +]
>
> :-)
>
> --
> Sung Kim <hunkim@cse.ucsc.edu>
> http://www.cse.ucsc.edu/~hunkim
>
>  "Dreams become reality!"
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Jim Davis wrote:
>
> > At 06:03 PM 1/30/2002 -0800, Sung Kim wrote:
> >
> > >In point of implementation view, currently specified prefix and postfix
> > >mixed style needs stack things to parse
> >
> > Sorry, but which operators are postfix?  I thought all the operators were
> > prefix?
> >
> >
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2002 22:19:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:08 GMT