> So if we really need to provide this feature, I'd define a > new construct > like: > > <D:like> > <D:binding-name/> <!-- borrowed from RFC3253 --> > <D:literal>image/%</D:literal> > </D:like> > > which of course would only work for the last path segment. Name the construct <D:path/> (or path-name) instead of <D:binding-name>, and then it will work for the whole path as well as the last segment. Of course the major thing is not to name it right, but to define it so that it covers what you want. Does the user want both? lisaReceived on Tuesday, 28 May 2002 22:36:53 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:08 GMT