W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: DAV:from

From: Jim Davis <jrd3@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:58:31 -0800
Message-Id: <>
To: Bita Shadgar <shadgar@cs.bris.ac.uk>, www-webdav-dasl <www-webdav-dasl@w3.org>
At 03:09 PM 11/29/2001 +0000, Bita Shadgar wrote:
 > Now, consider we want to compare a value of especial property of a 
resource in a
 > collection with the value of the same property(or something else) of 
resources in other
 > collections. In this case you should use many propfind method to compare 
value of our
 > given property with the value of the properties in all other resources 
in different collection.
 > However, if we were allowed to have more than a collection in DAV:from , 
we would able
 > to handle it in one request.

I think I begin to understand the problem you are trying to solve, but I am 
not sure.  Here is an example use case.  If the use case is not correct, 
please say how I misunderstand.

The example application is for shopping comparisons.  You have N 
collections, each of which represents a vendor catalog.  Each collection 
contains resources that represent products, for example MP3 songs.  The 
resources have properties such as title, artist, size in bytes, and cost in 

An example query is to find, for a given title, the vendor with the lowest 

Is this a good example of what you want?  if it is not, then please provide 
an example.

If this example is correct, then the problem is not just in dav:from, it's 
the entire basicsearch query language.  The comparison operators in 
DAV:basicsearch allow you to compare a property value to a *literal*, not a 
variable.  you can not write a query that compares the properties of two 
resources even if they are in the same collection.

If this is what you need, then you need a more powerful language that 

dav:basicsearch is, as the name implies, *basic*.  it is intended to meet 
the most common needs for simple searching ("find all MP3 by Zakir Hussein 
with price less than 20").  There is nothing in it like the SQL join, for 

Note that DASL is not limited to the DAV:basicsearch query language, it's 
just that DAV:basicsearch is the lowest common denominator that every 
server must provide.

In the real world, if you need to provide this kind of application now, 
using only DASL and the basicsearch, you would have to write a "web 
crawler" that visited each catalog, and merged the records.  Then you could 
do a search and sort by price.

I hope this is helpful

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2001 11:59:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:42 UTC