At 06:29 AM 12/9/98 PST, LeVan,Ralph wrote: >> From: Jim Davis [mailto:jdavis@parc.xerox.com] >> I think it's also reasonable to consider, from the library >> point of view, >> whether LDAP might work as well as DASL. Do you have any >> thoughts on that? > >I can't really believe you made that suggestion. The objections that the >Web community has consistently expressed about Z39.50 are it's statefulness, >binary encoding and transmission over raw tcp/ip. LDAP has all those >deficiencies. In addition, it has a really weak searching mechanism. Thanks. It's good to get input from a librarian's perspective. FWIW, the Isaac project (http://scout.cs.wisc.edu/scout/research/rfp/IssacCall.html) is using LDAP for metadata search. I don't know why they picked LDAP, (except that probably they started before DASL was proposed, and they have working code now), but it seemd to me possible that to a librarian there might be other factors I had not considered.Received on Wednesday, 9 December 1998 14:15:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:04 GMT