W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > July to September 1998

RE: Must scopes be collections?

From: Saveen Reddy (Exchange) <saveenr@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 16:57:59 -0700
Message-ID: <2FBF98FC7852CF11912A0000000000010B0CDAF1@DINO>
To: www-webdav-dasl@w3.org

> 1) a scope is named by a URI.  A scope consists of a set of Web resources.

Sounds fine

> 2) If the scope name is the URI of a WebDAV collection, then every
resource
> in that collection (depending on the value of depth) is in the scope.

Same here

> 3) If the scope name is the URI of a different kind of Web resource, the
> scope is just that resource
>
> 4) otherwise, the set of resources is defined by the server.
>

I think for 3 and 4 should collapse into "If the scope name is the URI of a
different kind of Web resource, then the the set of resources in the scope
is defined by that scope-resource". This allows both 3 & 4 and avoids
mentioning "server".

-Saveen
Received on Thursday, 9 July 1998 19:57:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 March 2009 03:38:04 GMT