RE: "contains" must be optional

At 10:43 AM 7/1/98 PDT, Fisher Mark wrote:

> If (2) is chosen, you
>still need to implement (1) for truly unknown (mistyped etc.) operators.
>So let's go with (1).

That convinces me.  Option 1 is out.

One last detail.  Should we say that a server MUST return an error if the
query contains unimplemented or unknown operators, or only that it MAY?  I
propose the former.

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 1998 16:32:26 UTC