W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webdav-dasl@w3.org > April to June 1998

RE: ANY in the DASL spec

From: Babich, Alan <ABabich@filenet.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 1998 14:03:17 -0700
Message-ID: <72B1992276A9D111A20E00805FEAC96D0FD679@cm-expo1.filenet.com>
To: "'Jim Davis'" <jdavis@parc.xerox.com>, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
I certainly hope there are no instances of ANY in the spec.
anywhere. I've been given to understand that using ANY is bad
practice for virtually any production XML document.
Furthermore, in the case of a spec., if you want to achieve 
interoperability, and we do, you have to nail things down sufficiently.

So, I certainly am in agreement that ANY should be
eliminated from the spec. as far as possible.

Alan Babich

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Jim Davis [SMTP:jdavis@parc.xerox.com]
> Sent:	May 06, 1998 6:36 PM
> To:	www-webdav-dasl@w3.org
> Subject:	RE: ANY in the DASL spec
> Just checking, but did we reach agreement (at least between Saveen and
> Judy) to make the grammer specific where possible (e.g. not use ANY
> where
> prop will do), etc?
> I believe the last message I saw (from Saveen) indicated that Judy had
> persuaded him.  I want to make sure that's right, and test whether
> there
> are any others lurking who object, or perhaps all are now convinced?
Received on Thursday, 7 May 1998 17:05:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:38 UTC