Ignore my last email on "Three categories of log files"

From: Marc Abrams (abrams@vt.edu)
Date: Mon, Apr 26 1999


Message-ID: <37247982.A1DFB027@vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 10:34:42 -0400
From: Marc Abrams <abrams@vt.edu>
To: www-wca@w3.org
Subject: Ignore my last email on "Three categories of log files"

Ignore this note I sent.  I misread Henrik's note and I see it's been
resolved.

Marc Abrams wrote:
> 
> Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> >
> > The discussion of certified vs. uncertified logs made me realize that there
> > in fact are three categories and not just two:
> >
> > 1) certified entries which have passed a set of tests and we can recommend
> > 2) entries that failed the certification test
> > 3) entries that haven't been processed yet
> 
> How exactly shall we handle category 3?  I can see a couple of ways:
> 
> - No record in repository of any traces until the certification process is
> complete (and traces then fall into 1 or 2).
> 
> - A repository record saying that trace is awaiting processing, but without a
> pointer to the actual trace (so that no one uses the trace before
> certification).
> 
> Comments?
> 
> --
> Marc Abrams, Associate Professor
>   508 McBryde Hall, Dept. of Computer Science, Virginia Tech
>   Blacksburg, VA 24061-0106 U.S.A.
>   voice:  (540) 231-8457, fax: (540) 231-6075

-- 
Marc Abrams, Associate Professor                         
  508 McBryde Hall, Dept. of Computer Science, Virginia Tech
  Blacksburg, VA 24061-0106 U.S.A.
  voice:  (540) 231-8457, fax: (540) 231-6075