Message-ID: <F1824E0390EBD1118D4C0008C724E4D1AAB7A2@rock-msg-s1.thomtech.com> From: "Brodsky, Lloyd" <Lloyd.Brodsky@Thomson.com> To: "'Jim Pitkow'" <email@example.com>, "'firstname.lastname@example.org'" <email@example.com> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 09:52:03 -0400 Subject: RE: Just what is a certified log? and who certifies it? Different goal certainly call for different methods -- but I'm still having some problems visualizing what the repository's certification process would consist of and what potential problems that process would avoid. The notion of the RECIPIENT being able to certify anything other than its own identify and mere receipt of a log file is an interesting one and a concept that I'd like to hear more about. I've been doing traffic analysis work with a number of Thomson companies and I'd like to help. I'm just trying to visualize what you'd do to certify, say, the Toronto Globe & Mail's 3.5 gig of extended format logs a week (the largest of the 34 Thomson newspapers) were I to send them over. ----- Lloyd Brodsky, Senior Researcher Thomson Labs, Office of the Chief Technology Officer The Thomson Corporation 1375 Piccard Drive Rockville, MD 20850 Voice: 301-548-4044 Fax: 301-527-4032 -----Original Message----- From: Jim Pitkow [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: Thursday, April 22, 1999 2:24 AM To: Brodsky, Lloyd; 'email@example.com' Subject: Re: Just what is a certified log? and who certifies it? Hi Llyod, The goal is for the repository to do the certification. While the entities you mention are certainly involved in similar type work, their focus is different than the WCA, which is why we are defining a new set of requirements. Hope this helps. Thanks for the input.Jim. At 02:27 PM 4/20/99 , Brodsky, Lloyd wrote: >Forgive me if this is a well-understood term in your domain, but it's not in >mine. A certified log could range from anything from a third party trusted >logging service to the interactive division of Audit Bureau of Circulations >(at least one of our operating units is certified by them) to a mere >assertion that your logs were kept in accordance with yet-to-be-established >WCA or the already-existent CASIE measurement principles.