www-voice@w3.org from July to September 2015 by date

Wednesday, 30 September 2015

• Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION? Kazuyuki Ashimura
• Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION? Dan Burnett
• Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close Jerry Carter

Tuesday, 29 September 2015

• RE: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close Brad Porter
• RE: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION? Michael Bodell
• Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION? Kazuyuki Ashimura
• Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION? Jim Larson
• Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION? Kazuyuki Ashimura

Monday, 28 September 2015

• RE: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close Michael Bodell
• RE: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close Baggia, Paolo
• RE: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION? Deborah Dahl
• Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close REUNION? Jim Larson

Saturday, 26 September 2015

• Re: ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close KARAM, GERALD (GERALD)
• Re: Namelist continued Jon Kerny
• Re: Namelist continued Jim Barnett
• ALL: Thoughts and thanks as the VBWG comes to a close Dan Burnett
• Re: Namelist continued Jim Barnett
• Namelist continued Jon Kerny

Friday, 25 September 2015

• Namelist parameter Jon Kerny

Tuesday, 1 September 2015

• RE: SCXML 1.0 is now a Recommendation! Michael Bodell
• RE: SCXML 1.0 is now a Recommendation! Baggia, Paolo
• RE: SCXML 1.0 is now a Recommendation! Jim Barnett
• SCXML 1.0 is now a Recommendation! Dan Burnett

Wednesday, 19 August 2015

• Proceedings of the SCXML Workshop 2015 are available Dirk Schnelle-Walka

Monday, 17 August 2015

• Re: ECMAScript specific IRP test278 has dynamic datamodel in txml Jim Barnett

Sunday, 16 August 2015

• ECMAScript specific IRP test278 has dynamic datamodel in txml Stefan Radomski

Wednesday, 5 August 2015

• blackjack.xml visualization problem aysegül kahraman

Friday, 31 July 2015

• Re: UI for authoring SCXML documents David Junger

Thursday, 30 July 2015

• RE: UI for authoring SCXML documents Michael Bodell
• Re: UI for authoring SCXML documents David Junger
• RE: UI for authoring SCXML documents Rob Rudin

Wednesday, 29 July 2015

• RE: UI for authoring SCXML documents Michael Bodell
• Re: UI for authoring SCXML documents Jacob Beard
• UI for authoring SCXML documents Rob Rudin

Thursday, 16 July 2015

• Re: Hidden anchors in SCXML specification - can I refer to them? Jim Barnett
• Hidden anchors in SCXML specification - can I refer to them? Stefan Radomski

Wednesday, 15 July 2015

• Re: [SCXML] history state in parallel state Erik Verbruggen
• Re: [SCXML] history state in parallel state David Junger
• Re: [SCXML] history state in parallel state Erik Verbruggen
• Re: An IDL for SCXML interpreters David Junger
• Re: [SCXML] history state in parallel state David Junger

Tuesday, 14 July 2015

• [SCXML] history state in parallel state Erik Verbruggen
• Re: An IDL for SCXML interpreters Jacob Beard

Friday, 3 July 2015

• An IDL for SCXML interpreters Stefan Radomski
• SCXML2015 Workshop - Action Points towards W3C Community Reports Stefan Radomski

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 September 2015 15:02:27 UTC