W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: Spec column in SCXML IRP table

From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:37:19 -0500
Message-ID: <54621F1F.5040300@gmail.com>
To: www-voice@w3.org
Ah, yes, you're right.  I forgot to edit the manifest.xml.  It should be 
fixed now.

- Jim
On 11/11/2014 6:37 AM, Stefan Radomski wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2014, at 13:58, Jim Barnett <jim.barnett@genesys.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that's because I moved the algorithm later in the Appendices. It is now Appendix D, while it was A before.  So all Appendices  before D have moved up a letter.
>>
> I am sure thatís true, nevertheless, this makes the ďSpecĒ column in the IRP table incorrect for quite a few tests :)
>
> E.g. test436.txml is not testing a functional requirement from C.1 as indicated in the table and the manifest from the IRP page, but from B.1. Itís no big deal, the references still point to the correct section as the anchors are still correct, however, the section these anchors appear under are not correctly labeled.
>
> Regards
> Stefan
>
>> - Jim
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stefan Radomski [mailto:radomski@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de]
>> Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 3:24 AM
>> To: www-voice@w3.org (www-voice@w3.org)
>> Subject: Spec column in SCXML IRP table
>>
>> Hey there,
>>
>> Datamodels and IO Processors are shifted by one alphabet character in the "Spec" column on the IRP page. Datamodels are "B", not "C" and IO processors are "C", not "D".
>> Stefan
>>
>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2014 14:37:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:45 UTC