W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2014

Re: Missing SCXML Test Coverage

From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:28:12 -0400
Message-ID: <53B2D38C.1090804@gmail.com>
To: Gavin Kistner <phrogz@me.com>, Jim Barnett <jim.barnett@genesys.com>, Stefan Radomski <radomski@tk.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>, "www-voice@w3.org (www-voice@w3.org)" <www-voice@w3.org>
On this point, though, I think you're right.  We should add tests for 
<assign> with child  content.  Tests 287 and 487 test <assign> with 
'expr'.  I will add tests 287a and 487a that test with <content>.  
Instead of adding <conf:content>, I think I'll add <conf:someVal> which 
can be a child of <content>.  Then I'll add conf:eventDataSomeVal and 
conf:idSomeVal that test that _event.data and the specified variable 
have whatever val was created by <conf:someVal>.  I will use 
<conf:someVal> in test354 as well.

On 6/30/2014 5:16 PM, Gavin Kistner wrote:
> One feature that I know that LXSC does not support is not covered in 
> the tests:
> <assign> elements with child content instead of an expr attribute.
> I'm not sure if there are others features not covered by tests.
> Ideally every "must" in the specification would have at least one test 
> file backing it.

Jim Barnett
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 15:28:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:45 UTC