W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: Suggestions for onentry/onexit tags

From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:55:57 -0500
Message-ID: <52D3FE7D.2060502@gmail.com>
To: www-voice@w3.org
Andreas,
   Please let us know if you are satisfied with our response to you 
email.  If we don't hear from you by January 21, we will assume that you 
are and proceed with publishing the next version of the specification.

   Best,
  Jim Barnett

On 1/3/2014 3:58 AM, Andreas Gansen [Masked] wrote:
> Preview: Hey there, We are working on an SCXML-Editor. Between reading
> Safely received through a Masked Email. IF THIS IS SPAM, CLICK HERE TO 
> BLOCK THIS MASKED EMAIL. 
> <https://emails.abine.com/disableDisposable?fwd=FWD_3Xtr0yqS@opayq.com>
>
> Hey there,
>
> We are working on an SCXML-Editor. Between reading the draft and 
> parsing the scxml we noticed that onentry/onexit tags can occur 0 till 
> inf times for a state.
>
> Would it not be better to have 0 or 1 occurrence?
> That would avoid the question: How can I exit a state multiple times 
> without re-enterring before?
> The code from each handler would then be concatenated.
>
> Please note either way:
> The final state 3.7.2 ( http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/#final )
>  considers one entry of onentry/onexit tags only.
> While the schema does not:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/04/SCXML/scxml-core-strict.xsd
>
> Regards,
>
> Andreas

-- 
Jim Barnett
Genesys
Received on Monday, 13 January 2014 14:56:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:44 UTC