- From: Jim Barnett <1jhbarnett@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:34:53 -0400
- To: www-voice@w3.org
We have had more problems with quotes than anything else in the tests - putting them in, taking them out, doubling them, undoubling them. Does anyone else have an opinion on what to do with these tests? On 6/19/2014 9:27 AM, Gavin Kistner wrote: > test179.txml has: > <send event="event1"><content>123</content></send> > <transition … conf:eventdataVal="123” … /> > > My data model evaluates the text content of <content> as code, so that <content expr=“123”/> is the same as <content>123</content>, and my transformation of the tests converts the condition above to <transition cond=“_event.data.val==123” … />. > > However, test354.txml has this: > <send event="event2"><content>foo</content></send> > <transition … conf:eventdataVal="'foo'” … /> > (notice the single quotes around the ‘foo’ inside the double-quotes). > > This breaks my data model, since evaluating foo as a Lua expression results in nil, not the string ‘foo’. If I switch my data model to interpret the text child of <content> as a string instead, then test 179 would fail. > > > I can modify this test to change to <content>’foo’</content>, but I think this is too specific to ECMAScript and Lua data models. I would suggest that at a minimum this test should match the pattern from test179. However, ideally, I am afraid that more conf: is really needed here, to be properly generic for data models. > > -- Jim Barnett Genesys
Received on Friday, 20 June 2014 14:35:35 UTC