W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2013

Re: Fallback for LCCA when <scxml> is included

From: Gavin Kistner <phrogz@me.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 21:50:52 +0000 (GMT)
To: Gavin Kistner <phrogz@me.com>
Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Message-id: <5b7c14c2-b3fe-45a5-b442-7b5046295da9@me.com>
On Feb 12, 2013, at 02:40 PM, Gavin Kistner <phrogz@me.com> wrote:
[...] Consider this document:

    <scxml xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml" version="1.0">
      <transition cond="In('a')" target="pass"/>
      <parallel id="p"><state id="a"/></parallel>
      <final id="pass"/>
...which, I now see, is an invalid SCXML document, since <transition> elements are (oddly) not allowed on the <scxml> element itself.

This limitation prevents the problem originally described by this thread. Please feel free to ignore this thread, and accept my apologies for the noise.

(Apparently I really need to put in document level validation in my interpreter so that I stop spending time on hand-authored test cases that happen to be invalid. :p)
Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 21:51:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:07:43 UTC