Re: updated SCXML draft

On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:03 PM, chris nuernberger <cnuernber@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> The potential problem is that the algorithm completely activates parallels
> before running all the targets in a transition.  So someone could
> potentially construct a transition that causes the parallel to activate
> using its initial configuration with the first target and then the next
> target in the transition would activate a specific non-initial state
> underneath the parallel.
>

It would be useful to post a reduced test case that illustrates this
behaviour. Thanks,

Jake