W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: SCXML schemas still don't validate with respect to UPA

From: Jacob Beard <jbeard4@cs.mcgill.ca>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:02:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CADywnFj1W7-O2icomkWQBFqHLB4CjgyNWuPLKDChq+7xi=TmrA@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-voice@w3.org
Cc: George Yanev <ygeorge@applicata.bg>, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com>
Hi George,

I can verify that the updated SCXML schema files from Jim worked with
xmllint (libxml) and xerces validators.

Jake

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Jim Barnett <Jim.Barnett@genesyslab.com> wrote:
> George,
>
>    Try using these schema files, which will be published with the next
> draft.  I am using them with Xerxes and not having problems with the UPA
> rule.
>
>
>
> -          Jim
>
>
>
> From: George Yanev [mailto:ygeorge@applicata.bg]
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:18 PM
> To: www-voice@w3.org
> Subject: SCXML schemas still don't validate with respect to UPA
>
>
>
> Hi Jacob,
>
> Three months ago there was a discussion about sxcml schemas which don't
> validate with respect
>
> to UPA rule.
>
> You mentioned about a fix in the new draft but still the schema files are
> the same.
>
> Will there be a new version of the xsd files or we have to find ways to
> bypass this rule in validators?
>
>
>
> Greetings
>
> George
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 14:02:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 April 2012 14:03:02 GMT