RJ, we confirm that we accept the proposed resolution. Thanks, Petr On 19.8.2010 13:49, RJ Auburn wrote: > Petr: > > We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to CCXML IR and specification. > > * This change has been applied to the CCXML spec and will be in the PR version of the document when we next publish. > > Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider it implicitly accepted. > If you need clarifications, please feel free to let us know and we will do our best to resolve them. > > Best regards, > > RJ > > --- > RJ Auburn > CTO, Voxeo Corporation > tel:+1-407-418-1800 > skype:zscgeek > > > > On Apr 13, 2010, at 8:53 AM, RJ Auburn wrote: > >> Petr: >> >> Good find. This is tracked as ISSUE-675. We will get that fixed. >> >> RJ >> >> --- >> RJ Auburn >> CTO, Voxeo Corporation >> tel:+1-407-418-1800 >> >> On Apr 13, 2010, at 4:59 AM, Petr Kuba wrote: >> >>> Hello www-voice, >>> >>> It looks like there has been a typo in Appendix K.3 introduced in the Candidate Recommendation. >>> >>> The sentence in the second paragraph below the reserved HTTP parameters list reads: >>> >>> For example, a parameter named "1" with a value of "1" represents >>> an object named "a", which has a property "b" with a value of "1". >>> >>> The sentence should be: >>> >>> For example, a parameter named "a.b" with a value of "1" represents >>> an object named "a", which has a property "b" with a value of "1". >>> >>> The problem is in the parameter name: it is "1" and should be "a.b". >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Petr Kuba >>> >>> -- >>> Petr Kuba, Project Manager >>> OptimSys, s.r.o >>> kuba@optimsys.cz >>> Tel: +420 541 143 065 >>> Fax: +420 541 143 066 >>> http://www.optimsys.cz >>> >>Received on Friday, 20 August 2010 07:53:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 20 August 2010 07:53:22 GMT