W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: July CCXML Implementation Report: 10_2_3: missing transition for connection.disconnected - should be 10_2_4 - ISSUE-739

From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:57:03 -0400
Cc: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A2C692D7-C259-4187-AD1B-04A6A0661C98@voxeo.com>
To: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz>
Tracked as ISSUE-739


On Jul 27, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Petr Kuba wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> this report deals with test 10_2_4, assertion 1286.
> 
> Sorry for the confusion.
> 
> Petr
> 
> 
> On 26.7.2010 11:47, Petr Kuba wrote:
>> Hello www-voice,
>> 
>> In 10_2_3, assertion 1295 shows the following code:
>> 
>> 
>> <transition event="user.START_ASSERTION_1286" state="ASSERTION_NMBR_1286">
>> <!--
>> 1286
>> 10.2.4 &lt;assign&gt; and &lt;var&gt;
>> Execution of connection elements MUST NOT immediately change the state
>> of any associated Connection Objects mscott@voicegenie.com Accepted
>> -->
>> <disconnect connectionid="ConnectionID"/>
>> <if cond="session.connections[ConnectionID].state == Connection.CONNECTED">
>> <script>assertions[assert_index].P_F = s_PASS;</script>
>> </if>
>> <send targettype="'ccxml'" target="session.id" name="name_prepare_new"/>
>> </transition>
>> 
>> Unfortunately there is no <transition> for connection.disconnected. If
>> this event is delivered before the event generated by <send> the
>> following message is logged:
>> 
>> 10_2_4 TA-1286: Comment: UNEXPECTED EVENT connection.disconnected IN
>> STATE ASSERTION_NMBR_1286
>> 
>> We recommend to handle connection.disconnected correctly to keep the
>> test clear.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Petr
>> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 14:58:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 July 2010 14:58:12 GMT