W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2010

Re: April CCXML: Number of connection.merged events - ISSUE-723

From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:08:21 -0400
Cc: www-voice <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C42EA786-FD66-4AEA-A791-98E58B7C0F2F@voxeo.com>
To: Petr Kuba <kuba@optimsys.cz>
Petr:

This is tracked as ISSUE-723. 

	RJ

On Jul 2, 2010, at 4:56 AM, Petr Kuba wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I've just noticed the following text in the CCXML specification, Section 10.5.10.2 (Merge Overview):
> 
> "A connection.merged event MUST be generated on each of the two calls affected by a merge."
> 
> Is there any reason to generate two events although both connections must be in the same CCXML session? Further more, implementation report (e.g. assert 285) expects also only one connection.merged and it would fail in case of two events.
> 
> My recommendation is to change the specification to gnerate only one connection.merged. Otherwise it is necessary to modify the implementation report script(s).
> 
> Thanks,
> Petr
> 
> -- 
>  Petr Kuba, Project Manager
>  OptimSys, s.r.o
>  kuba@optimsys.cz
>  Tel: +420 541 143 065
>  Fax: +420 541 143 066
>  http://www.optimsys.cz
> 
Received on Thursday, 29 July 2010 14:09:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 July 2010 14:09:32 GMT