W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: April CCXML: no unjoined for 859 in 10_5_8_A.txml - ISSUE-698

From: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 14:09:52 +0200
To: Chris Davis <davisc@iivip.com>
CC: Baggia Paolo <paolo.baggia@loquendo.com>, "www-voice@w3.org" <www-voice@w3.org>, W3C Voice Browser Working Group <w3c-voice-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20E062AE0851CC41B7FBECC23638796F39464642C5@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
Chris,

We are in the process to address all ISSUES related to IR. The goal is to re-publish the CCXML-IR in a short term.
Please explicitly confirm that you accept the proposed resolution or after one week we will consider implicitly accepted the resolution. If you need clarification, please ask them very soon.

Paolo Baggia
Author of CCXML-IR Plan

ISSUE-698:

Proposed Resolution: Accept

Fine to add a transition for 'conference.unjoined' event in 10_5_8_A.txml

=================================
Chris:

This is tracked as ISSUE-698. 

	RJ

---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting              +1-407-418-1800      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Come join us at our Voxeo Customer Summit
June 21st - June 23rd at the Hard Rock Hotel
Register today for your All Access Pass:  
http://www.voxeo.com/summits/customer


On May 24, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Chris Davis wrote:

> Hello www-voice,
> 
> The test sheet needs a do-nothing transition:
> <transition event="conference.unjoined" state="ASSERTION_NMBR_859">
>       </transition>
> 
> or assertion  #977 never runs.
> 
> The test does not account for the unjoined as a result of a previous <dialogterminate>
> in the same assertion(#859).
> 
> Regards,
> Chris
> 
> -- 
> Chris Davis
> Interact Incorporated R&D
> 512-502-9969x117
Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 12:10:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 June 2010 12:10:34 GMT