Dear Raxit, Thank you for your comments. We believe your request to be out of scope for SSML 1.1 as defined both in the document itself and in the requirements document [1] that preceded it. We propose to defer this request to a future version of SSML. If you disagree with our resolution, please let us know. If we do not hear from you within two weeks of today we will assume that you have accepted our resolution. Dan Burnett SSML 1.1 Co-Editor Voice Browser Working Group [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/ssml11reqs/ On Dec 9, 2008, at 4:42 PM, Raxit Sheth wrote: > Hi > > > It is good to have some standardized logging mechanism across SSML > implementations. > > I think it can be introduce without disturbing rest of the language > structure. > > Increasing popularity and acceptance of SSML, developer will like > this feature. > > > -RaxitReceived on Tuesday, 13 January 2009 01:53:28 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 13 January 2009 01:53:30 GMT