W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2008

FW: Vxml grammar with termtimeout=0s. How should the intrepeter react?

From: Michel Brabants <Michel.Brabants@telindus.be>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:48:47 +0200
Message-ID: <4C95A2806C1B5C42BBC5801B08691501027C3D79@TBE1MXCV1.telindus.intra>
To: <www-voice@w3.org>
> Hello,
> 
(2nd time I'm sending because the first one seemingly didn't arrive.)

> I've written a small vxml-grammar and the product on which we use it
> is not reacting like I think it should. Could someone confirm or
> correct what the expected behaviour should be according to vxml 2.1?
> 
> This is the grammar (I know it could be written better :)):
> 
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> 
> 
> <grammar xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/06/grammar" xml:lang="en-US"
>          xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" 
>          xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2001/06/grammar 
>  
> http://www.w3.org/TR/speech-grammar/grammar.xsd"
>          version="1.0" mode="dtmf" root="NatRegNumber">
> 
> <rule id="digit" scope="public">
> 	<one-of>
> 		<item>0</item>
> 		<item>1</item>
> 		<item>2</item>
> 		<item>3</item>
> 		<item>4</item>
> 		<item>5</item>
> 		<item>6</item>
> 		<item>7</item>
> 		<item>8</item>
> 		<item>9</item>
> 	</one-of>	
> </rule>
> 
> <rule id="NatRegNumber" scope="public">
> <!--A National registry number is permitted, or not input.-->
> <one-of>
> 	<item>
> 		<item repeat="1-11">
> 			<ruleref uri="#digit"/>
> 		</item>
> 		<item repeat="0-1">
> 			#
> 		</item>
> 	</item>
> 	<item>#</item>
> </one-of>
> </rule>
> 
> </grammar>
> 
> 
> Termtimeout=0s and there is no termchar. Interdigittimeout and timeout
> are 3s. The interpreter doesn't end immediately after the '#', but
> waits the interdigittimeout. Shouldn't it end immediately?
> 
> -------------------------------------
> Another one. I've written the following grammar:
> 
> \d{11}?
> 
> Termchar is '#' and termtimeout > 0s. If I only enter '#' on the
> phone, shouldn't it pass as a valid input because I've entered dtmf
> input, so that the no-input can't be thrown (according to the examples
> in the specification). The input actually passes the grammar as I
> allow empty input. Am I correct or wrong?
> 
> Thank you for your help and kind regards,
> 
> Michel
> 
> 
> Michel Brabants
> Telindus NV 
> Geldenaaksebaan 335, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium 
> Mailto:michel.brabants@telindus.be
> 
> Telindus. Change things your way. 
> http://www.telindus.be
> 
Received on Tuesday, 23 September 2008 08:22:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 September 2008 08:22:53 GMT