W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > July to September 2007

RE: Using ECMAScript 357 in SCXML

From: Andrew Gilmartin <agilmartin@tazznetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:01:31 -0400
Message-ID: <07FDEE0ED7455A48AC42AC2070EDFF7C0154FA70@corpsrv2.tazznetworks.com>
To: <www-voice@w3.org>

Plugable is nice but does not lead to interoperability. Perhaps XPath
should be allowed everywhere (for example if element's cond attribute
and assign element's expr attribute). If XPath does not define the
meaning of true and false in the context of the value at the end of a
location then define it in SCXML.

-- Andrew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barnett, James [mailto:James.Barnett@aspect.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 1:57 PM
> To: Andrew Gilmartin; www-voice@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Using ECMAScript 357 in SCXML
> 
> The data model will be made pluggable in the next draft of SCXML, so
> that implementations will have a choice.
> 
> - Jim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Gilmartin
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 1:42 PM
> To: www-voice@w3.org
> Subject: Using ECMAScript 357 in SCXML
> 
> 
> The State Chart XML working draft, 27 Feb 2007, specifies the use of
> ECMAScript 262 for use in expressions. Given that the data model is
most
> often expressed as XML have you considered instead specifying
ECMAScript
> 357 so that we can use E4X expressions? This would allow for using
> almost semantically identical XPath and ECMAScript expressions to
access
> the data model.
> 
> http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-357.htm
> 
> -- Andrew
Received on Friday, 6 July 2007 18:01:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 July 2007 18:01:46 GMT