W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: SCXML: New version of Synergy SCXML

From: Torbjörn Lager <torbjorn.lager@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 03:05:19 +0100
Message-ID: <6ad4bdae0703201905t4d75ae12u19fd3d7d3de5aa7c@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Barnett, James" <James.Barnett@aspect.com>
Cc: "Serge Voloshenyuk" <serge_voloshenyuk@yahoo.com>, www-voice@w3.org

On 3/20/07, Barnett, James <James.Barnett@aspect.com> wrote:
>
>
> What is the ID used for?  If you look in the algorithm, you'll see that it
> requires the implementation to generate a unique ID for each invocation.
> This allows the *.Done events to be assigned to the correct states and
> finalize tags.  Do you want the ID reflected at the markup level?

But how can you match on the ID.Done event if the ID is machine
generated? That's why I felt the need to use a human-generated one.
(Perhaps the state's ID would do, since a state containing an <invoke>
cannot at the same time contain a <final>?)

- Torbjörn



>
> - Jim
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>
> From: www-voice-request@w3.org [mailto:www-voice-request@w3.org] On Behalf
> Of Serge Voloshenyuk
>  Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:22 PM
>  To: www-voice@w3.org
>  Subject: Re: SCXML: New version of Synergy SCXML
>
>
>   >BTW, I felt the need to introduce an 'id' attribute for <invoke>...
> perhaps
>
> >there's another way to do it?
>
>
>
> You have id of the state which invoke it. State can't have several
> <invoke>s.
>
>
>
>  ________________________________
>
>
> Be a PS3 game guru.
>  Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Yahoo!
> Games.
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 02:05:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 March 2007 02:05:25 GMT