W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-voice@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Comments on CCXML Working Draft 19 January 2007

From: RJ Auburn <rj@voxeo.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 10:20:12 -0500
Message-Id: <8BF31E2D-36E3-4DF6-9D96-6064BBA51A2F@voxeo.com>
Cc: <www-voice@w3.org>
To: Hrvoje Nezic <hrvoje.nezic@envox-lab.hr>

This is being tracked as ISSUE-107

	RJ

---
RJ Auburn
CTO, Voxeo Corporation
tel:+1-407-418-1800



On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Hrvoje Nezic wrote:

>
> 6.2.7: <fetch>
>
> Current text:
> "The event is one of fetch.done, which indicates that the  
> identified content was fetched successfully, or error.fetch,  
> indicative of a failure to fetch the requested content."
>
> Proposed text:
> "The event is one of fetch.done, which indicates that the  
> identified content was fetched successfully and in case of CCXML  
> document, XML parsing / validation was performed, or error.fetch,  
> indicative of a failure to fetch the requested content. "
>
> It is not quite clear from the description of <fetch> what the  
> CCXML interpreter should perform before its sends the fetch.done  
> event.
>
> 6.2.2.2: <meta> Attribute Details
>
> Current text:
> " Either the name or the http-equiv attribute has to be specified.  
> If neither of them is specified, or if both are specified, an  
> error.fetch event must be thrown."
>
> Proposed text:
> ""
>
> I think that this part of specification is in contradiction with  
> section 9.5.2: "Document Initialization Errors", which states:  
> "Errors that occur during documentation initialization (elements  
> that occur in the CCXML document before <eventprocessor>) occur  
> outside of CCXML's event handling mechanism. These errors MUST  
> cause the CCXML thread of execution to terminate and notify the  
> platform of the document error."
>
> The element <meta> occurs in the CCXML document before  
> <eventprocessor>, so it should be handled according to section 9.5.2.
>
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:20:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:20:21 GMT